At p. 387 of the recently published "Life and Letters" of the late Principal Forbes, the following passage occurs:
"I believe that the effect of the strugglethough unsuccessful in its immediate objectwill be to render Tyndall and Huxley and their friends more cautious in their further proceedings. For instance, Tyndall's book, again withdrawn from Murray's 'immediate' list, will probably be infinitely more carefully worded relative to Rendu than he at first intended."
This passage has been selected, among others, by Principal Shairp, the editor of this portion of the "Life," from a letter addressed to A. Wills, Esq., under date of November 14, 1859: the "struggle" to which it refers arose out of an attempt on the part of some influential friends of Principal Forbes, who were at that time members of the Council of the Royal Society, to obtain the Copley medal for him; and it took place at the Council meetings which were held on October 27 and November 3, 1859.
I was not a member of the Council at this time, and therefore, I could take no direct part in the "struggle" in question. But, for some years before 1859, glaciers had interested me very much; I had done my best to inform myself in the history of glacier research; I had followed with close attention the controvesy which had been carried on between Prof. Tyndall and his friends, on the one hand, and Principal [James] Forbes and his supporters on the other; and, finally, I had arrived at a very clear conviction that the claims made for Principal Forbes's work, could not be justified.
Under these circumstances I thought it would be a most unfortunate occurrence if the Council of the Royal Society, containing as it did, not a single person who had made the glacier question his especial study, should practically intervene in the controversy then raging, and throw its weight upon the side of one of the combatants, without due consideration of what was to be said on the other side.
A friend of mine, who was a member of the Council, shared these views; and, in order to enable him to enforce them, I undertook to furnish him with a statement which he could lay before the Council when the award of the Copley medal came up for discussion.
It is not necessary to state what took place at the meetings of the Councilsuffice it to say that the Copley medal was not awarded to Principal Forbes.
So far, therefore, as my statement may have contributed to this result, my efforts were completely successful. Principal Forbes's very influential champions in the Council were left, as I am informed, in a hopeless minority; and instead of tending to make me more cautious in my "future proceedings," what occurred on this occasion should have emboldened me.
The notion expressed by Principal Forbes that I and Prof. Tyndall's other friends were in any way discouraged by the results of our battle, is therefore strangely erroneous; however, I do not know that the error would have been worth correction, if Prof. Tyndall had not been referred to as one of those who took part in the fray. But, in justice to Prof. Tyndall, I am bound to say that he knew nothing about the battle until after it was over. My ally in the Council and I agreed, for reasons which will be obvious to any honourable man, that Prof. Tyndall, though an intimate friend of ours (and largely because he was so), ought not to have any knowledge of the action we took; and, in a note dated November 4, 1859, I find myself suggesting to my friend in the Council, that Tyndall ought to be kept in his then ignorance "until his book is out." I have every reason to believe that this suggestion was carried into effect; at any rate, Prof. Tyndall did not see the drift of my statement till a year ago when (on May 13, 1872) I sent it to him accompanied by some other documents and the following note:
"Routing among my papers yesterday I came upon the enclosed cinders of an old fire, which I always told you you should see some day. They will be better in your keeping than mine."
I am informed that there was not even an attempt to controvert the leading points of my statement on the part of the advocates of Principal Forbes's claims; and therefore the assertion that Prof. Tyndall was led to word "infinitely more carefully" what he had already written about Rendu, by anything which occurred in the Council, is simply preposterous.
In making these remarks I have no intention of throwing the slightest blame upon the late Principal Forbes; who surely had a perfect right to express to an intimate friend whatever impression was left upon his mind, by such reports as reached him of the occurrences to which he refers. But I confess I find it difficult to discover any excuse for the biographer, who deliberately picks the expression I have quoted out of a private letter, and gives them to the public, without making the trouble to learn whether they are, or are not, in accordance with easily ascertainable facts.
C. Blinderman & D. Joyce